To avoid magnetization of a current transducer, the following measures can be taken:
By taking these precautions, magnetization of the current transducer can be minimized or avoided, ensuring accurate and stable performance over time.
To demagnetize a transducer’s magnetic core, the following steps are typically used:
1.AC Excitation: A low-frequency AC source drives the magnetic core through its entire B-H hysteresis loop (the magnetic field vs. magnetization curve), applying alternating current to cycle the core’s magnetization from positive to negative saturation.
2.Gradual Decrease of Excitation: After cycling the core through the B-H loop for at least 5 full cycles at maximum amplitude, the amplitude of the AC excitation is reduced gradually. The rate of reduction should be no faster than 4% per cycle to ensure a smooth return of the core’s magnetization to zero (the origin of the B-H curve).
3.Time Requirements: Typically, a demagnetization cycle will require around 30 cycles at a low frequency, such as 500 milliseconds at 60 Hz.
For closed-loop transducers (devices that have a compensation coil), additional care is needed because the compensation coil can interfere with the demagnetization process by negating its effects. This interference can prevent the core from reaching its neutral state. Therefore, extra steps may be required to ensure proper demagnetization.
Alternatively, partial demagnetization can be achieved by applying a specific signal of opposite polarity to the core’s magnetization. However, this method is more complex because it requires precisely determining the correct amplitude and duration of the signal to effectively reduce the magnetization without overshooting or undercompensating.
In practice, if a specific application is well understood, it is possible to determine the necessary correction signal empirically and apply this whenever demagnetization is needed.
Demagnetization is essential for maintaining the accuracy and reliability of a transducer’s measurements, especially after strong magnetic influences or long-term use.
Let’s take a product with a supply voltage of +5V and an output of 2.5V ± 0.625V with a precision of 1% as an example.
Our Vref pin serves two functions: one is to act as a reference point for output, commonly used in differential input acquisition devices; the other function is for single-ended input acquisition devices, where it is used to control the sensor output, making the static output (2.5V) more accurate. It only affects the static output (2.5V when there is auxiliary power and no input signal) and does not affect the amplification (0.625V).
Due to the discreteness of product parameters, sensors cannot be perfectly identical and ideal, and there will always be some degree of error. For most of our products, the static reference point error is within ±15mV. This means the static output of 2.5V (with 0V or GND as the reference point) will be between 2.485V and 2.515V, which is considered within the acceptable range.
For example, for a product with a power supply of +5V and an output of 2.5V ± 0.625V with a precision of 1%:
If the output is referenced to 0V (GND), we calibrate it as follows:
First, check if the Vref voltage meets the requirements (standard is 2.5V ± 1%, generally no more than 0.5%).
The second step is to adjust the static output to between 2.485V and 2.515V (i.e., 2.5V ± 15mV).
The third step is to apply the input signal to the rated input and adjust the output to within 2.5V + (0.625V ± 1%).
Finally, check if the output at 10% of the rated input is accurate. If there is significant error, adjust the zero-point component for correction. Then, check if the zero-point and full-scale values meet the requirements. If everything is correct, the product moves on to the next process step.
If the output is referenced to Vref, we adjust it as follows:
First, check if the Vref voltage meets the requirements (standard is 2.5V ± 1%, generally no more than 0.5%).
The second step is to adjust the static output to between 2.485V and 2.515V (i.e., 2.5V ± 15mV).
The third step is to connect the black probe of the multimeter to the Vref point, apply the input signal to the rated input, and adjust the output to within 0.625V ± 1%.
Finally, check if the output at 10% of the rated input is accurate. If there is significant error, adjust the zero-point component for correction. Then, check if the zero-point and full-scale values meet the requirements. If everything is correct, the product moves on to the next process step.
If a product adjusted using the first method is used in a differential input acquisition device, the acquired signal will be inaccurate and may even produce negative output errors.
If a product adjusted using the second method is used in a single-ended input acquisition device, the acquired signal will also be incorrect and may result in overflow errors.
By default, our products are calibrated using the first method (referenced to 0V/GND), as most customers request this.
Example 1: A product calibrated using the first method, with Vref = 2.510V and Vout = 2.505V in the static state. This product is qualified, and the precision is acceptable. However, when used in a differential input acquisition device, since Vout is lower than Vref, the static output will be negative, which is incorrect.
Example 2: A product calibrated using the second method, with Vref = 2.510V and Vout = 2.520V in the static state. This product is also qualified, as the zero-point error does not exceed 15mV. However, when used in a single-ended input acquisition device, the output of 2.520V exceeds the calibrated 15mV error, and the full-scale value will also be higher, which could reach up to 2% in extreme cases, affecting the customer’s use.
Now that some customers have reported this type of error, we are asking them to provide calibration requirements to correct the issue. Sales representatives are also being asked to label products based on different calibration methods to ensure correct production for customers.
To calculate the input current of a transformer, you can use the following formula based on the transformer’s power rating, input voltage, and efficiency. The input current depends on the power demand on the secondary side (load), and this can be calculated for both single-phase and three-phase transformers.
For a single-phase transformer, the input current can be calculated using the formula:
Where:
If the efficiency is not given, it can be assumed based on typical transformer efficiency (for instance, 0.98 for a high-efficiency transformer).
For a three-phase transformer, the input current is calculated with a similar formula but with an additional factor for three-phase power:
Where:
Suppose you have a 500 kVA transformer, with a primary voltage of 11 kV (11,000 V) and an efficiency of 98%.
For a 500 kVA transformer, the power is 500,000 VA (since 1 kVA = 1,000 VA).
So, the input current for the primary side of the transformer is approximately 26.92 A.
This calculation helps determine how much current is drawn on the primary side of the transformer based on the output load.
In a current transformer (CT), the burden refers to the total impedance (resistance and reactance) presented by the connected measuring devices, such as ammeters, relays, or meters, to the secondary winding of the CT. It is usually expressed in volt-amperes (VA) at a specific secondary current (typically 1A or 5A) and can include the impedance of the connecting wires and instruments.
In summary, the burden is the load imposed on the secondary winding of the current transformer, and ensuring it is within the CT’s rated capacity is essential for accurate current measurement and safe operation.
A Residual Current Sensor (RCS) is an electrical safety device designed to detect residual current (also known as leakage current) in a circuit. Residual current occurs when there is an imbalance between the current flowing into a system (through the live wire) and the current returning from the system (through the neutral wire). This imbalance indicates that some current is leaking to the ground, often due to insulation failure, faulty wiring, or a person coming into contact with the electrical system.
In summary, a Residual Current Sensor is a critical safety device that continuously monitors circuits for leakage current, helping to protect people and property from electrical hazards by detecting imbalances in current flow and triggering protective mechanisms.
Rogowski coil also called differential current sensor, it is a “hollow” circular coil, arranged around the conductor, so that an alternating magnetic field generated by the current induces a voltage in the coil. The coil is actually a ransformer coupled to the conductor under test, and the voltage directly output from the coil is proportional to the rate of change of current, e.g. @50Hz/1kA Vout=85mV, @60Hz/1kA Vout=85*60/50=102mV. If you want to obtain the current waveform or current value that doesn’t matter to frequency also need to add the integral circuit to achieve 90° phase shift compensation and frequency equalization.
RF series is a flexible current sensor based on Rogowski coil principle, which is in small size, light weight and easy to install and offers a choice of different sizes, which can also be customized design of the customer requires a special order. It has no magnetic saturation and a shielding layer to resist the influence of external magnetic field, so stable measurements can be achieved in the range of low current to hundreds of kA. The flexible rogowski coil is an extremely comfortable solution for current measurement,
particularly suited to current monitoring and electrical retrofitting, can be used in many cases where a traditional current transformer (CT) is not available, or can replace it.Systems that use an ADC chips(ADS131M04) or a power metering ICs(ADE7753) that support the Rogowski coil principle are even more advantageous.
In essence, CTs are used for current measurement and VTs for voltage measurement, both essential for protection, control, and monitoring in electrical power systems.
版权所有 © 2024 PowerUC Electronics Co.